Should Judges Be Held Accountable Like Bartenders?
Should Judges Be Held Accountable Like Bartenders? If bartenders can be held responsible for over-serving someone who later drives drunk, it raises a big question: why aren’t judges held to the same standard when they release criminals who go on to kill others? In many states, “dram shop” laws make bars and bartenders legally accountable if they knowingly serve someone who is clearly intoxicated, and that person goes out and causes harm. The logic is simple — if you contribute to the risk, you share some responsibility. But judges are different. In the United States, judges are protected by something called judicial immunity. That means they can’t be sued or held personally liable for the outcomes of their rulings, even if those rulings lead to tragedy. The reasoning is that judges need to make decisions without fear of being sued every time something goes wrong, or else the system would collapse under constant legal challenges. Still, this raises a fair debate. On one hand, accountabi...